WATCH FULL EPISODE: https://youtu.be/N6dEZvyDsNg Subscribe Here: @juliandoreydaily JOE'S LINKS - X: https://x.com/joekent16jan19 - IG: https://www.instagram.com/joekent16jan19/?hl=en - BUY HIS BOOK: https://shorturl.at/PS195 --- Joe Kent — former NCTC director, combat veteran, Gold Star spouse, and the most credentialed public critic of the Trump administration's Iran policy — returns with Julian Dorey for one of the most wide-ranging and most strategically significant conversations in the series. This episode moves from the specific geopolitical calculation driving Israeli foreign policy right now, through the documented money strategy that is shaping American congressional races, through the Founding Fathers' warnings about foreign influence that Kent believes have never been more relevant, and finally to the most practically alarming question in the entire Iran war story: how exactly is America going to be the guardian of the Strait of Hormuz? The Israel going for broke thesis is the episode's most analytically significant opening. Kent's argument is specific and strategically coherent: Trump is the last truly pro-Israel president that Israel will ever have in the White House. American demographics are shifting. The Boomer and Gen X evangelical Christian voter base that has provided the unconditional political foundation for American support of Israeli policy is aging out of its political dominance. Younger generations — including younger evangelical Christians — do not hold the same unconditional position. The window for the kind of blank-check American political support that has characterized the relationship for decades is closing. And the Israeli government and its American political allies know it. Which is why they are going for broke right now — using the Trump window to accomplish as much of the strategic agenda as possible before the political landscape shifts permanently against them. The flood the zone money strategy is the episode's most practically documented thread. Kent describes a systematic approach to American political influence — deploying money across congressional races, supporting primaries against members who ask inconvenient questions, and using the combination of campaign contributions and media pressure to create an environment in which the political cost of asking honest questions about American foreign policy toward Israel is higher than most members of Congress are willing to pay. The Thomas Massie race is the most recent and most illustrative example — a genuine grassroots congressman who has consistently asked the questions his constituents sent him to Washington to ask, targeted by a systematic money campaign that Kent argues is the most direct illustration available of how foreign-influenced money operates in American congressional politics. The Founding Fathers thread is the episode's most historically grounded and most philosophically resonant segment. George Washington's Farewell Address warned specifically and explicitly about passionate attachment to foreign nations — arguing that such attachments corrupt domestic political judgment, create artificial alignments that serve foreign interests rather than American ones, and undermine the independence that democratic self-governance requires. Kent argues that the Founding Fathers were describing with remarkable precision the dynamic that is operating in American foreign policy right now — and that America's track record with these entanglements is so consistently bad that the burden of proof should fall on those who want to deepen them rather than those who want to question them. The Strait of Hormuz closing question closes the episode with the most practically urgent and most honestly alarming strategic question in the entire Iran war story. America has now committed — implicitly if not explicitly — to keeping the Strait of Hormuz open. Twenty percent of the world's oil passes through that waterway. Iran has demonstrated the capability and the willingness to threaten it. And Joe Kent asks the question that the administration's public statements have consistently avoided: how exactly are we going to do that — indefinitely, sustainably, and at what cost in American lives and treasure — and has anyone in Washington honestly calculated whether the American people have consented to that commitment? --- ***TIMESTAMPS*** 00:00 - Foreign Money Buying American Policy 10:29 - Petrodollar Sanctions and the Trump MOU 21:04 - Hot War and Restraining Israel 30:19 - Butler Assassination and FBI Failures 39:59 - Ayatollah Assassination Intent and Government Rot 50:04 - Mossad CIA and JD Vance @juliandoreydaily ​