Monthly episodes discussing this topic, 2023-06 to 2025-11.
Not enough disagreement in the transcripts to form camps. These are the positions taken by people with demonstrated expertise on this topic first, then by how many people heard them on it, then by VoiceRank.
The UK's COVID-19 inquiry is a disappointment that fails to analyze competing hypotheses or engage with the logic of lockdowns.
“I of course have my personal opinion of what drove the dynamics of the virus and what we could have done, but what I really feel is uh a sense of great disappointment on behalf of the British public because I would have thought that the minimum that a British taxpayer would expect from this kind of ”
UnHerd · Nov 2025 · 1 episode · 37K views on this topicThe government is right to pursue a judicial review to clarify what is legally relevant and protect the principle of confidential government communications.
“so the government is For Better or For Worse and I'd probably argue for better trying to get a clear legal ruling because the president set around this is incredibly important for the way that you do government and they're trying to I think defend an important principle which is that governments nee”
The Rest Is Politics · Jun 2023 · 1 episode · 11K views on this topicThe government should not be taking itself to court, and it should cooperate fully with the inquiry's request for unredacted information.
“I think the approach the government is taking is the wrong one because I think I I have no doubt at all this could have been resolved without going to court I just don't believe it couldn't have been resolved”
The Rest Is Politics · Jun 2023 · 1 episode · 11K views on this topicPositions are extracted from transcripts by a model and may misattribute who said what. Every quote links to the episode it came from.