Monthly episodes discussing this topic, 2024-12 to 2026-06.
Not enough disagreement in the transcripts to form camps. These are the positions taken by people with demonstrated expertise on this topic first, then by how many people heard them on it, then by VoiceRank.
He demands accountability and transparency regarding the release of the Epstein files and believes those associated with the island deserve to face justice.
“I want the names of the people that flew to that pedophile Island and guess what in correlation Tom with the tapes that you guys have the FBI they're turn guys they have the guy had truckloads of camera equipment and and freaking videotape for years of everybody that was there”
PBD Podcast · Feb 2025 · 4 episodes · 2.0M views on this topicShe believes the indictments against James Comey and Letitia James should be dismissed because they were sought by an improperly appointed prosecutor and lack probable cause.
“I predict that Judge Curry is also going to dismiss with prejudice these indictments, which means they cannot be brought again and the cases will be over.”
MeidasTouch · Nov 2025 · 1 episode · 143K views on this topicHe believes the police officers involved in the Henry Nowak case should face prosecution for criminal negligence.
“I think they're guilty of uh, some type of negligent homicide and I think they should be prosecuted. They should be sitting in a jail cell alongside the uh the defendant who is guilty of an absolute brutal um murder with that knife.”
Megyn Kelly · Jun 2026 · 1 episode · 98K views on this topicShe argues that Blake Lively's attempt to obtain attorney's fees is a misuse of the law intended to keep her relevant in the media.
“We have Blake Lively who is definitely misusing this law, trying to remain relevant, trying to remain in the headlines as desperately as she can. She just needs to walk away at this point.”
Megyn Kelly · Jun 2026 · 1 episode · 98K views on this topicShe believes it is improper for a judge to award attorney's fees without first holding a trial or evidentiary hearing to prove the existence of malice.
“last year when it was dismissed, it was dismissed procedurally. So, I wasn't understanding if if the case is dismissed, how are you awarding damages when a jury hasn't heard or a judge hasn't heard the facts, whether or not malice is there?”
Megyn Kelly · Jun 2026 · 1 episode · 98K views on this topicPositions are extracted from transcripts by a model and may misattribute who said what. Every quote links to the episode it came from.