Daniel Penny acted with justifiable intent to protect others, whereas the shooter of the CEO planned a cold-blooded murder.

“The intent in the other is try to prevent a potential murder or violent act they aren't in any way similar and it really boggles my mind Pierce that anyone could even try and analogize the two because again the only way you could come up in that scenario with situation and in any way analogize them ”

Condoning assassinations based on oppressor-oppressed narratives is an extreme and shocking moral failure.

“I mean it's absolutely shocking and look what it gets to the core of is the continued dehumanization of people because in the sort of culturally Marxist Paradigm of oppressor vers supressed you're allowed to do whatever you want to someone who has allegedly or in this case I'm not a supporter of the”

Simon believes that there are situations where vigilante justice is justified and rewarding.

“I don't know. I think of plenty of examples where vigilante justice would be quite rewarding. I wouldn't be above vigilante justice. I think vigilante justice has a place.”

The host questions whether vigilante justice is a dangerous idea for society to embrace.

“That's how society collapses. This that's bold. And and I want to ask, is this truly a case that makes us worry about the collapse of society, or is this simply a dad in Arkansas doing what he had to do to protect his daughter?”

Bootleg Kev maintains that society should prioritize the physical punishment and vigilance against child predators as a universal moral imperative.

“No, keep I mean, dude, man, everyone should be trying to beat up pedophiles. That's I feel like as a nation, we should want to [ __ ] up pedophiles.”