The war initiated by the Trump administration against Iran is an aggressive, illegal, and catastrophic war of choice that lacks a viable strategic endgame.

“So a war of choice. Anyone you hear out there saying preemptive strike blah blah blah. you should kindly disregard everything they have to say after this because this is an aggressive illegal war of choice from this president and the Israelis and there will be massive like repercussions that we cann”

The war in Iran was initiated by Donald Trump without a clear plan or legitimate goals, resulting in economic instability and a global crisis.

“He had no plan for what was going to happen. He had no goals because all he really wanted to do was have a dramatic show of force that might help his terrible job approval ratings”

The war in Iran was an ill-conceived conflict initiated without clear strategic objectives, proper congressional authorization, or transparent justification for the American public.

“If the Trump admin were to accomplish every goal or objective, this this was not a good war. Nothing about this is such a who is this guy”

She argues that the administration lacks a coherent plan or endgame for the conflict and that the war is an unpopular departure from Trump's promise to avoid foreign entanglements.

“The thing is they haven't thought this through. Donald Trump doesn't think things through. There is no endgame. There was no clear objective. I'm still waiting for him to explain this to anybody coherently.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene believes the United States should not be involved in the war with Iran because it is an expensive foreign conflict that does not benefit Americans.

“As a matter of fact, it's cost Americans tens of billions of dollars, not only to their pocketbook, what they've had to pay at the gas pump and inflation, but also what it's costing them in the budget because here goes Congress having to spend hundreds of billions more because of his bombing campaig”

Dave Rubin argues that maintaining the current blockade on Iran is a strategic victory for the United States that costs nothing while putting pressure on the Iranian regime.

“So, basically we're in a slight pause right now. The ceasefire is holding. We're in a slight pause, but you in some sense you could argue a pause is good for us cuz the blockade remains in place.”

The United States is conducting an incredibly effective military operation against Iran that is minimizing casualties and achieving success.

“I think this is one of the most successful military operations that we've seen from the United States.”

Military action against Iran is necessary because the regime has no functioning economy and is actively racing to acquire a nuclear weapon as its final survival strategy.

“If they give up their nuclear capacity or the race to a nuke, then they are a weakened military structure sitting atop a population of 90 million people, most of whom hate them. And that is incredibly dangerous for them. And so now, the real question is going to be making permanent that state of aff”

He believes the U.S. is not engaging in a 'forever war' or invading Iran, but rather responding to a national security threat posed by an Iranian regime that sponsors terrorism.

“He did not going to go in and do what we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. And I think what the president also understood in pivoting is once he was back in the White House and saw the intelligence and realized what Iran is doing and what they're clearly trying to do and what they're trying to do not onl”

Matt Tardio argues that the U.S. military action against Iran was necessary to secure global interests and contain the Iranian regime.

“The answer is yes. And but not because of Iran, but because of the actual global implications and putting America's interests first, right? And particularly with what's taken place with Russia and China on the global stage and using the IRGC.”