Monthly episodes discussing this topic, 2026-03 to 2026-07.

The people on the most episodes about this topic over the trailing three months, excluding their own shows — ordered by VoiceRank, their score across the whole corpus. The chart tracks each one’s episodes month by month.

Not enough disagreement in the transcripts to form camps. These are the positions taken by people with demonstrated expertise on this topic first, then by how many people heard them on it, then by VoiceRank.

HN

Harry NelsonguestUnrated

A judge blocking federal administrative actions must be based on a reasoned process and transparency as required by the Administrative Procedure Act.

“he essentially signaled that the way that policy shifts, particularly ones that have broad national implications, happen is supposed to happen with a reasoned basis and an appropriate process, even when an agency has authority to make a decision”

Bloomberg Podcasts · Mar 2026 · 1 episode · 359 views on this topic

John E. Jones IIIguestUnrated

Vulgar or inflammatory language used in judicial opinions is inappropriate and undermines the professional norms of the judiciary.

“I don't believe that that's appropriate in the business of judging.”

Bloomberg Podcasts · Mar 2026 · 1 episode · 359 views on this topic

Positions are extracted from transcripts by a model and may misattribute who said what. Every quote links to the episode it came from.