Social media platforms have weaponized their power to systematically suppress conservative voices.

“they openly decided that they were going to suppress and that I mean I'm one of the loudest critics of the because it's it's been really damaging what they've done to the reputation of the CIA it's really damaging what they've done to the intelligence Community”

YouTube's reliance on algorithms and its restrictive policies make it an undesirable platform for creators compared to Rumble.

“You don't get algorithms telling you to watch transgender tutorial makeup guides, whatever's going on on YouTube these days. I have no idea because it's a cesspool of filth and sadness where dreams go to die.”

Social media platforms should allow open debate on both sides of the gender identity issue rather than restricting discourse.

“if you're going to have a platform that talks about both sides of the issue you have to let the other side be able to speak as well”

YouTube actively and unfairly suppresses content by demonetizing and burying videos they deem too mature or violent, even when those videos are age-gated and follow community guidelines.

“it's really bad censorship it's like it's terrible it's like the worst platform right now you know why because of ATS yeah advertisers yeah yeah if they're if the video is gonna get shown to its full potential yeah so like there's no ads and there's restrictive reach”

Social media platforms' overreaction to the New York Post story by censoring it was a blunder that confirmed conservative suspicions of bias.

“twitter and facebook overreacted and i think that the story was well in the process of being debunked by the internet and it was like twitter and facebook didn't trust that process to happen and so they intervened”

Logan Paul believes private platforms have the right to enforce their own rules and censor content.

“the platforms have every right to do what they want it's kind of like if you're using their vehicle you got to respect them you know I mean you've got to respect their rules and regulations it's their vehicle like you said it's their platform they put you at this but if you kind of go in a direction”

He objects to social media companies allowing violent speech, as he believes it can foster civil unrest.

“so by allowing this type of stuff you might be fomenting some type of civil war which is not what mark zuckerberg intended he just wanted to get his dick wet”

YouTube is justified in removing channels like Tenant Media that are complicit in state-funded propaganda campaigns, whereas other creators might not be directly implicated.

“If YouTube did delete Lauren why would they not delete everyone else there because Lauren is directly implicated there are definitely offers from RT and RT subsidiaries that are made to a lot of right-wing content creators that a lot of people in the rightwing scene know”

Social media companies are not free speech absolutists and are justified in creating and enforcing community standards to prevent systemic harm.

“no one who's in charge of a platform can be a free free speech absolutist is not possible uh because once you are in charge of a system where there have to be some rules then absolutism is impossible”