The acquittal of a sex offender for indecent exposure in a women's locker room based on the lack of proof of arousal sets an outrageous and dangerous precedent.

“What we're being told and the precedent that this that this trial has set is that a sex offender can expose himself to children and it's not indecent exposure unless you can prove that he was visibly aroused. I mean, what the hell it what the hell kind of madness is that?”