Cloud gaming currently offers a surprisingly high-quality experience that is very playable, despite inevitable trade-offs in latency and image fidelity compared to local hardware.

“It's improved a lot since the last time I used it and I'm on a mouse. I should try with a controller where it's even harder to tell how much latency there is. Do we have one? I wouldn't notice. Damn impressive.”

He argues that cloud gaming via Chromebooks makes little sense for people who want a serious gaming experience.

“In terms of these new laptops I feel like they make less sense than what stadia did because I think most people playing games on computers especially with really really great specs are generally looking to be a little more like zoned in less lag maybe even more competitive-esque stuff”

Bob defends the viability of Stadia, arguing that its infrastructure is efficient and produces minimal latency for gaming.

“I don't get it I don't understand why so many people out there are so against stadia I can get not being behind google as a company but stadia works to this day I use it I love it it's so convenient”

Stadia was a great service that likely failed because Google decided to spin off the technology instead of continuing to operate it directly.

“da was great and we all know it that's it I don't have anything else oh okay lucky for you guys since we love the small talk section so much today's topic is kind of like an extension of small talk”