Linus believes that the current YouTube revenue sharing policy for Shorts is disingenuous because it excludes certain ad views.

“why would anybody click on the shorts feed if they weren't driven there by Short's creators what makes you think that it was it was you and you alone who is was responsible for that interaction for that ad view there is actually zero rational defense”

Luke supports the new Shorts revenue sharing model because it allows creators to use copyrighted music while still receiving compensation.

“this is the way to make it so that shorts can contain copyrighted music so you can actually have like clips from Rihanna and Drake Taylor Swift like whatever else so that you can upload the same content to YouTube shorts that you could to tick tock and unlike Tick Tock YouTube is actually going to s”

YouTube's content moderation policies are often intentionally vague, allowing the platform to apply rules inconsistently based on subjective factors.

“it's one of those things if you know anything about these platforms and the terms of service you know that they're very vague and they're they're very vague on purpose so you can have some leniency for certain content creators contextually speaking”