Aquinas's Third Way aims to demonstrate God's existence. But does it succeed? NOTE (ADDED 3/21/26): This video represented my views at the time of recording. Some of my views have changed since then, but I'm leaving the video up because it contains lots of helpful information, and also shows my thinking at the time. 0:00 Introduction 0:21 Outline 0:53 ST I q2, a3 2:23 Interpretations 4:32 Maimonides 6:53 Definitions 9:12 Pawl’s formulation and critique 13:22 My quasi-formulation 18:46 Premise (1) 28:06 Premise (4) 33:58 Premise (6) 35:16 Premise (19) 39:23 Moorean defeaters and summary 40:46 Concluding remarks Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason Book: https://www.amazon.com/Majesty-Reason-Critical-Thinking-Philosophy-ebook/dp/B086G7KS52#ace-9766277718 Website: https://majestyofreason.wordpress.com/ From Necessary Being to Purely Actual Being? https://majestyofreason.wordpress.com/2020/02/02/from-necessary-being-to-unchangeable-being/

20 Cosmological Arguments: An Analysis

Over 100 Arguments for God ANSWERED

Aquinas's First Way: An Analysis

Has Trent Horn Disproved Christianity?

Existential Inertia Defended | Part 2/2

Why Am I Agnostic?