The playoff selection committee's decision to exclude Florida State due to the injury of a specific player is a flawed rationale.

“I don't care did Florida State earn the right to go into the playoffs I don't care who's their quarterback now I don't care who their coach is now that team and that group of players did they earn the right to go there that's the only reason I have an issue with the the reason they gave”

It is unfair to exclude a team from the college football playoffs based on a conference championship loss if they have the same number of losses as teams that did not play in a championship game.

“If I make it to the If I make it to my conference championship Yeah. and I lose and I got the same losses as somebody that didn't play in a conference championship, and you put them in and kick me out, that's some bulljive.”

He argues that Florida State deserved a spot because they met the necessary criteria and won their games.

“I believe that when you look at the nature in which the game is played and the way that people are rewarded for success if you give me a level or certain criteria that if adhered to should earn me a certain thing then you should get that right”

The current playoff format is spectacular and features the four most physical and best teams.

“I mean, this is spectacular, and the best four teams, the most physical four teams, have made it to the semifinals, and we love that.”

The college football playoff committee should prioritize selecting the best teams over those that are merely deserving based on their resume.

“my whole thing is I I just don't want if the reasoning on the at large teams is they're better not only the resume but they're a better team than then put them in I just don't I just don't want to see a team get in because they're 11- one you know and if the logic is they're 11 in one that they shou”

He believes Florida State should have been excluded because they were not one of the best teams without their starting quarterback.

“Florida State without Jordan Travis is not a team that should be playing for the national championship they're talented yes but they're playing in a terrible conference and it has no respect and we saw the committee doesn't respect him”

The decision of which teams make the college football playoff is heavily influenced by the revenue generation potential of the school's brand.

“One, not only the school the name and how much do you bring to the economy being in them goddamn playoffs? Cuz at the end of the day, it's all about money.”

He believes the college football selection committee ignores set guidelines to choose teams based on what they want for revenue and viewership.

“they've always shown us that they pick the teams they want to pick and so like being upset about it is what it is it don't matter because they don't answer to nobody they're sending a very bad signal overall”

The committee's playoff rankings are essentially generated by a computer rather than through the intense human debate they claim.

“It's because they're lying to you and a computer spits that stuff out and then they just kind of slap their name on the side of it and then they have to go on TV and try and explain the rankings process, but they didn't really take part in it.”

The absence of traditional powerhouse programs like Georgia, Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio State in the semifinals is beneficial for the sport.

“This is the first time since the college football playoff started that Georgia, Bama, Clemson, or Ohio State are not into the semifinals. I think that's good for the sport.”

The current college football playoff format is a positive change because it excludes traditional powerhouses like Ohio State, Alabama, and Georgia from the final four.

“If memory served, since we've gone to the 14 playoff and now to the 12 team playoff, I think this might be the first year where none of those teams are in the final four. >> So yeah, we have >> So it's all we got all new colors.”