The current Supreme Court is operating as a political body rather than a neutral judicial one that respects democracy.

“and taking I think it's important to to kind of step back mentally from the Supreme Court as it exists right now and recognize that they are the people on the Supreme Court. The six members of the rightwing on the Supreme Court are no longer acting like a body of jurists, like a people who are reall”

The Supreme Court lacks legitimacy and has become a group of rogue actors using their power to strip away the rights of Americans.

“I completely agree with you and I think this is a time where we have to form alliances across all political spectrums against anti-black racism. I think a lot of what we're going through right now is because we allow certain narratives to exist.”

The Supreme Court has lost its legitimacy and must be reformed through measures like packing, term limits, or ethics codes to address its role in stripping away American rights.

“the Supreme Court has completely lost any legitimacy. Totally. Um and that's why for me right now for the next leader that I elect nationally, the president I'm going to hear about packing the court. I want to hear that from not just presidents, I want to hear that from senators”

The Supreme Court majority acts as a political body that ignores records and established facts to reach desired social engineering outcomes.

“They don't do that anymore in this MAGA world. They just come up with the decision they want to reach, destroy the the district court's hard work, and then just announce whatever um whatever social engineering order that they want to do.”

The current Supreme Court majority has shown a willingness to abandon originalist and textualist principles when those methodologies do not align with their political preferences.

“Is it going to have purchase, you know, on these hacks, um, who have been only too willing to abandon originalism, textualism, and every other methodology that they purport to adhere to, um, when it serves them.”

She believes the ruling is significant for maintaining the perceived integrity and independence of the Supreme Court.

“if the Supreme Court had not done this, if they had gone against the text of the statute and had ruled in his favor, think about what we'd be saying right now. This court is totally in Trump's pocket would be one of the things that's that would be said. So, it's so important on so many different lev”

He claims the Supreme Court's majority opinion definitively interpreted the AIPA statute as excluding the power to impose tariffs.

“the basic premise of the opinion is that um the AIPA statute, which empowers the president to take action to regulate importation, doesn't extend to imposing tariffs.”

The speaker argues the Supreme Court's ruling is a major win for the Constitution because it prevents the president from unilaterally imposing tariffs without Congressional say.

“I agree. This is just a tremendous day. um a huge win for the Constitution, for folks who cover tax policy, for anybody who remembers the Revolutionary War, and we fought against specifically a taxation power that Congress did not have any say over.”

The recent Supreme Court ruling upholding birthright citizenship is legally incorrect.

“Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld birthright citizenship. And that is a legal abomination. It's legally wrong.”

The Supreme Court lacks the authority to dictate deportation policy to the executive branch and the president should ignore their rulings on this issue.

“The Supreme Court doesn't have the authority to tell the president that he can't deport illegal aliens. Um they don't have the authority to set up to set policy on, you know, on how that is carried out.”