The current Department of Justice is acting as a rogue and corrupt entity that ignores legal standards and court orders.

“There's a sort of a there's a split screen going on here. We're watching in real time in real life how federal courts, public interest groups, the public are expressing themselves to try to control on the fly an outof control rogue department of justice. most corrupt in our history”

The US Supreme Court acts in a corrupt manner by shielding the Trump administration from accountability.

“So unfortunately, it looks like Law and Order is being upheld at the lower levels for the courts, but when it gets to the Supreme Court, they're like the supremely corrupt court and they just do whatever Trump wants.”

The Supreme Court creates different sets of rules depending on which political party benefits.

“This is a court that has fallen over itself to create different sets of rules depending on which party those rules would benefit.”

Jared Yates Sexton believes the Supreme Court is an illegitimate body that was designed by the wealth class to function exactly as it currently is.

“This is an illegitimate court. This is a stolen court. Everybody knows that. It's been bought and sold by the wealth class which actually literally owns financially multiple members of the court. And then on top of that, I like to remind people of something which is that the Supreme Court in general”

Federal judges are increasingly using their authority to check the Trump administration's overreach and maintain the rule of law.

“The Department of Justice is out of gas. Grand juries, juries, chief judges, judges, exjudges, and current judges are all banding together to protect our rule of law and re-establish it.”

Jack Smith is a principled and earnest public servant who conducted his investigations based on evidence rather than political bias.

“And the thing the big takeaway I I had was he comes across as being totally forthcoming, wanting to answer as many questions as he can. He has made it clear that he is he can't talk about the Mar-a-Lago Lago documents case because there's a an injunction from uh Judge Aileen Cannon saying he can't.”

The current judiciary system is still sound and has not been fully politicized.

“I think that that's especially now more than ever, that is encouraging sign that the entirety of the judiciary has not been politicized.”

The jury composition was unsatisfactory because it lacked African American representation.

“I'm certainly not happy with the makeup of the jury who didn't have one which did not have one African-American on it.”

The exclusion of potential jurors of color based on the prosecution's stated reasons raised concerns about the objectivity of the deliberation process.

“It gave me pause immediately of whether there was going to be an objectivity in the deliberation process.”

Judges who prioritize outcomes over the law in their rulings undermine the judiciary.

“they rule based on an outcome, not based on what the law is as it's written. They're not confined to the facts of the case. They're not confined by law. And I think that puts a citizenry in a very uncomfortable place”