Loading
Episodes · 12 months
189
Nov 2025–Oct 2026peak share, Feb 2026
Share of analysed episodes per month, Nov 2025 to Oct 2026: 6 of 3,584, 22 of 3,862, 4 of 4,115, 86 of 4,226, 17 of 4,731, 16 of 4,438, 10 of 4,230, 10 of 4,319, 3 of 4,515, 10 of 4,419, 5 of 4,624, 0 of 4,594.
All time
294
+2 via 2 narrower
On record
128
took a position
Where they standLast discussed
1mo ago
Sep 16, 2026
Who's talking
Top voices on this topicThe eight guests on the most episodes about this topic in the last 13 weeks, not counting their own shows or clips they were only heard in, most episodes first. VoiceRank (their score across the whole corpus) is shown for context and only breaks a tie. Each strip is that guest's episodes week by week, and the newest week is still in progress.
#Guest · last 13 weeksEpisodes, sorted, most firstVoiceRank
1
NG
IW
TH
Episodes on this topic, by weekEvery analysed episode tagged with this topic in each of the last 13 weeks, across all shows and whoever was on them. The newest week is still in progress, and recent weeks fill in as transcripts are analysed. Point at a name, or tab to it, to highlight the weeks that guest was on an episode.
All shows
Episodes on this topic per week, weeks starting Aug 17 to Nov 9 (the last still in progress): 3, 0, 2, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.
Where they stand
Camps of opinion · 4Positions people took on this topic in transcripts, grouped by school of thought. The bar shows each camp's share of the people sorted into a camp. It is not a poll and not a share of any audience, and people whose position fit no camp are left out of it. Within a camp, people with demonstrated expertise on the topic come first, then those who reached the most listeners on it. Positions are extracted from transcripts by a model and may misattribute who said what. Every quote links to the episode it came from.
Share of people placed in a camp41 people
37%
29%
19%
15%
- Assert intelligence agency involvement15 people · 37%
- Question official death narrative12 people · 29%
- Demand full public transparency8 people · 19%
- View files as political weapon6 people · 15%
Assert intelligence agency involvement
Jeffrey Epstein acted as an intelligence asset or blackmail operative for state actors to manipulate and control powerful elites.
15 people · 14 episodes
He argues that Epstein functioned as a valuable intelligence asset by operating in the gray zone, facilitating global business deals and surveillance technology through his high-level connections.
“He's the guy that's operating in the in the gray zone and then in the end you come in and you know make a make an official like corporate and then you know state-to-state agreement.”
Piers Morgan Uncensored · Feb 2026 · 5 episodes · 3.5M views on this topic
He believes the theory that Epstein was an intelligence asset is a logical consideration given his vast unexplained wealth and curated access to powerful people.
“Without question, the theory that Epstein was an intelligence asset makes a lot of sense. He had a vast and mostly unexplained wealth. He kept meticulous and exhaustive records. He obsessively curated VIP friends who he invited to luxury properties wired for surveillance.”
Piers Morgan Uncensored · Feb 2026 · 4 episodes · 3.4M views on this topicDC
Jeffrey Epstein functioned as a freelance fixer who worked for a network of intelligence agencies from multiple nations rather than being solely tied to one organization.
“Epstein was an asset of this network of intelligence agencies that would, that would, that would do these things together.”
Tucker Carlson · Jul 2025 · 1 episode · 3.0M views on this topicQuestion official death narrative
The official explanation of Jeffrey Epstein's death as suicide is highly implausible, pointing to murder or a faked event.
12 people · 11 episodes
Jimmy Dore maintains that Jeffrey Epstein is not actually dead and that there is credible evidence to support the theory that he is still alive.
“I can't say 100% that he's still alive, but according to if you look at the pictures of his ear dead and his ear alive, they're to totally different ear structures. So, there's lots of credible evidence that points to that he's still alive.”
The Jimmy Dore Show · Jun 2026 · 16 episodes · 3.5M views on this topic
The official explanation of Jeffrey Epstein's death as a suicide is unbelievable given the inconsistencies in the case.
“there are just so many weird inconsistencies and questions that remain that it's just you know it's it's very hard for me to believe that the official story is truly what happened here.”
Breaking Points · Feb 2026 · 8 episodes · 2.0M views on this topicML
Marina Lacerda does not believe that Jeffrey Epstein is dead and suspects that he is still alive.
“I don't think he's dead.”
Bryce Crawford Podcast · May 2026 · 2 episodes · 1.8M views on this topicDemand full public transparency
Government entities should release all unredacted Epstein-related files to ensure accountability and provide justice for victims.
8 people · 7 episodes
Government entities should release all Epstein-related files to provide justice for victims and ensure accountability for perpetrators.
“They were elected to govern, not run from accountability, stay in Washington, release the files.”
Julian Dorey · Sep 2026 · 27 episodes · 4.4M views on this topic
Releasing the Epstein files, even with redactions, is a positive step that allows for further investigation into his history and network.
“it's a great example of why releasing the files with redactions appropriate redactions. We don't know whether these redactions, you know, are too far or whatever, but appropriate redactions opens this story up.”
Breaking Points · Sep 2025 · 8 episodes · 2.2M views on this topic
The government should fully release all available files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
“In my opinion, I think release everything. Release everything.”
Destiny · Jul 2025 · 8 episodes · 1.5M views on this topicView files as political weapon
The release or suppression of Epstein-related documents is primarily used as a tactical tool for partisan political attacks and cover-ups.
6 people · 6 episodes
Shaun Attwood believes Melania Trump's speech was a calculated attempt to change the narrative and shift attention away from the Jeffrey Epstein case.
“So, she's blatantly using the survivors to advertise her book. I mean, how does that make you feel?”
Shaun Attwood · Apr 2026 · 19 episodes · 4.0M views on this topic
Hasan maintains that the Epstein-related discourse is used as a distraction by Democrats to divert attention from Trump's controversial actions.
“By the way, the Democrats are distracting people by talking about the Epstein hoax as opposed to talking about his big beautiful actions of illegally using the military as a domestic police force on populous American metropolitan cities.”
HasanAbi · Sep 2025 · 5 episodes · 1.2M views on this topicAD
The Democrats are overly focused on the Epstein case as a way to challenge Trump.
“My other fear, though, is that the Democrats are putting all their eggs in the Epstein basket to try and bring down Trump.”
MeidasTouch · Dec 2025 · 1 episode · 184K views on this topicExtracted by a model; may misattribute who said what.
In the transcripts
Episodes discussing this topicIncludes episodes tagged with a narrower subject. Each is marked with the subject it came in through.
80%
Showing 10 of 30
Over time
Share of episodesThis topic's episodes as a share of every episode we analysed, in each complete month. We analyse more episodes every month, so a raw count would mostly show that growth. Recent months fill in as transcripts are analysed.
Complete months · first on record Feb 2020