📰 Subscribe to UnHerd today at: http://unherd.com/join UnHerd's Freddie Sayers meets climate scientist Patrick Brown. Patrick's paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06444-3 The Free Press article: https://www.thefp.com/p/i-overhyped-climate-change-to-get-published Read the accompanying article: https://unherd.com/thepost/climate-scientist-why-i-left-out-the-full-truth-in-my-research/ Listen to the podcast: https://plnk.to/unherd?to=page Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/unherd Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unherd/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/unherd/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@unherdtv // TIMECODES // 00:00 - 01:10 - Introduction 01:10 - 05:20 - Climate scientist Patrick Brown discusses his paper in Nature and the dominant climate narrative in academic journals 05:20 - 08:14 - Patrick’s overall view of climate change 08:14 - 10:12 - Should we focus more on climate adaptation than negative climate impacts? 10:12 - 14:40 - How Patrick framed his paper in order for it to be accepted by Nature 14:40 - 19:17 - Are academic science journals biased? Can science ever be neutral? 19:17 - 21:10 - Patrick responds to criticism by Nature’s editor-in-chief 21:10 - 22:41 - Understanding climate science/journalism bias 22:41 - 26:37 - The political backlash to Net Zero 26:37 - 30:32 - What climate mitigation/adaptation policies should we be looking at? 30:32 - 33:33 - If we can mitigate climate change, what does the future look like? 33:33 - Concluding thoughts #UnHerd #ClimateScience #Nature