Science has been exceedingly successful. But can we account for the success and objects of science without Platonism? Dr. Scott Berman, author of “Platonism and the Objects of Science” (2020), doesn’t think so. (Enjoy the bonus soccer, too!) Wanna get the newly-released paperback version of Scott's book? Check out this link for 35% off!!! https://drive.google.com/file/d/1soJdl-IuuT3jvJnwVU_B6-buYK0kEFtm/view?usp=sharing Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josephcschmid Scott’s (2020) book, “Platonism and the Objects of Science”, link: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/platonism-and-the-objects-of-science-9781350080232/ Question: Joe, are you a Platonist? Answer: No and sort of. No, in that I don't have a solid position in the debate — the literature is vast and I've mainly looked into the literature on models of God, arguments for/against God, and persistence. Sort of, in that I slightly lean towards realism about (some) abstract objects, and I also slightly lean towards thinking that [contemporary analytic] Platonism is the best realist view. OUTLINE And the usual links: My book: https://www.amazon.com/Majesty-Reason-Critical-Thinking-Philosophy-ebook/dp/B086G7KS52 My website: https://majestyofreason.wordpress.com/