Episodes per month, Oct 2025 to Sep 2026: 1, 1, 0, 2, 2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.
Systemic suppression of dissenting voices by government and corporate entities is a dangerous threat to free expression and democratic…
7 people · 6 episodes
He believes that mainstream media platforms intentionally engage in censorship, often to suppress conservative voices or perspectives.
“I don't know if the algorithm changed or it's censorship or whatever, but uh we're always trying to find ways to beat that.”
Shawn Ryan Show · May 2022 · 4 episodes · 5.1M views on this topicBig Tech and government censorship is a nefarious threat to free speech and requires strong action from State Attorneys General.
“I tell you this the censorship regime today whether it be government or big Tech on its own is more nefarious and pernicious than at any point in human history”
StevenCrowder · Jul 2024 · 6 episodes · 2.4M views on this topicVincent Oshana expresses disbelief at the suppression of dissenting voices and highlights that the government actively worked to silence opposition regarding COVID-19.
“This is the same Biden administration that sent the feds to Twitter and Facebook to bury stories. Bury the Hunter Biden laptop which had all the freaking big guy, all the payments and everything, and the COVID stuff.”
PBD Podcast · Jun 2026 · 3 episodes · 1.5M views on this topicMainstream media conglomerates are fundamentally corrupt and often avoid reporting on the truth or seeking justice for victims to maintain their relationship with the government.
“I think that there's a dayon between these Titanic media conglomerates and the government because the government could step in and break them up at any time so I think they appease each other”
Shawn Ryan Show · Oct 2024 · 1 episode · 753K views on this topicBill C-11 represents a dangerous and unconscionable attempt by the government to control information and suppress dissent through state-subsidized media and vague legislative power.
“it is shameful it is shameful to the essence that the main main Canadian press are not as one voice and a one intense voice saying we're not having this we are simply not having this you are not going to rule on what is information and not information”
Jordan B Peterson · Jul 2022 · 1 episode · 742K views on this topicMedia outlets and platforms are justified in enforcing professional standards or responding to public pressure to restrict inflammatory…
6 people · 3 episodes
Media outlets should terminate all staff members who engage in walkouts or protest against editorial decisions.
“There's a real simple solution here and it's that these media outlets need to terminate all of those staff members. Clean house.”
Timcast IRL · Sep 2025 · 3 episodes · 1.1M views on this topicSociety should not defend or support individuals or groups that celebrate political assassinations.
“Will Chamberlain changed my mind. Uh I had been of the position that I thought was rather harsh that we should not defend these people. I wouldn't advocate for them to be banned. They're allowed to have their opinions, but I will not defend them when they get censored. I changed my mind.”
Timcast IRL · Sep 2025 · 3 episodes · 1.1M views on this topicThe suspension of Jimmy Kimmel is not a free speech issue but a result of his inflammatory rhetoric and refusal to adhere to basic standards.
“I just don't think that I don't think that this even is again I don't think that free speech is the issue at hand. People will try and make it about free speech, but it really is about the the the inflammatory nature of the way that the left has been talking talking about the right”
Timcast IRL · Sep 2025 · 1 episode · 641K views on this topicThe influence of emotionally unstable staffers within media organizations allows them to bully editors and impact decision-making.
“It's crazy how much influence these staffers can have in media organizations because it's not just, I think, ABC, but also big media companies in America where staffers try and bully the editors, you know, of the New York Times, the, you know, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and so on.”
Timcast IRL · Sep 2025 · 1 episode · 423K views on this topicMedia companies are within their rights to suspend commentators who engage in inflammatory behavior that could incite political violence.
“If Jimmy went on the air, there would have been no way back from that monologue for Jimmy. We didn't want that. Everyone deeply values him and wants him to come back, but he has to take down the temperature.”
Timcast IRL · Sep 2025 · 1 episode · 321K views on this topicExtracted by a model; may misattribute who said what.
Showing 10 of 30
Complete months · first on record Nov 2019