Monthly episodes discussing this topic, 2026-01 to 2026-03.
Not enough disagreement in the transcripts to form camps. These are the positions taken by people with demonstrated expertise on this topic first, then by how many people heard them on it, then by VoiceRank.
The seizure of a reporter's electronic devices is an unconstitutional violation of First Amendment rights and a threat to the freedom of the press.
“We have privilege in this country. We have a first amendment right. And it went before a US magistrate judge, William Porter, who um has, at least for now, he's holding the ring.”
MeidasTouch · Jan 2026 · 1 episode · 107K views on this topicMedia reporting that someone is a suspect in a police investigation is not defamatory and does not warrant a successful lawsuit.
“What exactly does that mean? What is a suspect? A suspect means it's somebody that the police are looking at that they suspect is right there in the word might have done it. And the entire world is a suspect than a who done it like this.”
Megyn Kelly · Mar 2026 · 1 episode · 219K views on this topicLaw enforcement taking a reporter's devices via search warrant is an unjustifiable and dramatic step that crosses a professional line.
“No, it's it's it's I mean, why didn't they subpoena the information? Like, the fact that they went straight to a search warrant is really, I think, a very dramatic step.”
MeidasTouch · Jan 2026 · 1 episode · 107K views on this topicPositions are extracted from transcripts by a model and may misattribute who said what. Every quote links to the episode it came from.