Politicians who accept campaign donations from pro-Israel lobby groups are inevitably beholden to serving those interests.

“once you take money from those people, they have they serve them literally 100% of the time in my 30 years of covering politics.”

TPUSA operates primarily as a vehicle to secure and maintain funding from Zionist donors.

“This is about stuffing their pockets with hundreds of millions of Zionist donors' money. Stuffing their pockets, buying expensive houses. It's about corruption, shady business dealings, keeping that money going, baby.”

Wealthy elites, such as George Soros and various foundations, intentionally fund protest movements to consolidate their own power rather than dismantle it.

“If this movement is truly against billionaires and the powerful, why is it funded by billionaires and the powerful? It is no longer hard to dig deep into the so-called no kings movement. And the more you dig, the more you realize this isn't a rebellion. This is strategy.”

Wealthy individuals exert undue influence through super PACs that operate with limited transparency and funding caps.

“but the super PAC is the dark money that came in after the Supreme Court decision, Citizens United. And what that said is that money is speech.”

He claims that political fundraising platforms should be donor-first and use data to make contributions more strategic and accountable.

“that is really where Oath came from was trying to tip the scales in grassroots donor's favor to say actually you should have the same quality of data and strategy behind your $10, your $50, your $100 as Elon Musk or some billionaire has behind their money.”

She believes that traditional political fundraising is overdue for competition and that donors need more effective ways to give.

“I believe that you guys at Oath feel that even with this ridiculous inquiry aside, the traditional political fundraising apparatus like Act Blue was kind of overdue for real competition.”