Loading
Topic
Non-Fungible Tokens
- Episodes
- 3
- Communities
- 3
Over time
Mentions over time
Monthly episodes discussing this topic, 2021-03 to 2021-10.
Where they stand
Talking points
Not enough disagreement in the transcripts to form camps. These are the positions taken by people with demonstrated expertise on this topic first, then by how many people heard them on it, then by VoiceRank.
Graham Stephen considers NFTs to be a valid and legitimate concept, particularly for their utility as resellable assets that provide access.
“This makes This makes a little a little bit more sense as you as you It makes sense. Like for that, I'd say it makes sense in the sense and it's it's just it's security. I like that. It's resellable. I like that.”
The Iced Coffee Hour · Mar 2021 · 1 episode · 93K views on this topicJB
Justin Blau believes that non-fungible tokens serve as digital certificates of authenticity that offer a way to prove ownership of digital content.
“what it really means is it's just a digital certificate of authenticity, like a land deed, but on the blockchain.”
The Iced Coffee Hour · Mar 2021 · 1 episode · 93K views on this topicPositions are extracted from transcripts by a model and may misattribute who said what. Every quote links to the episode it came from.
Related
Related topics · 8
In the transcripts
