See if you're overpaying for car insurance with Jerry: https://pnl.link/MdNNeEo Kevin Reddington convinced 11 of 12 jurors that Lindsay Clancy was not criminally responsible. One juror held out, and on September 4th Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial. Since then Reddington has lost almost every motion he’s filed — including his attempt to put the holdout juror on the stand under oath. On November 2nd he argues double jeopardy. I’ll tell you why that fails too, and it comes down to a Supreme Court case from 1824. But here’s the part nobody’s saying out loud: when this goes to a retrial, the advantage swings back to Lindsay Clancy. She’s hired Marty Weinberg — the same appellate specialist Karen Read used. The core facts aren’t changing. The mental health history isn’t changing. And 11 of 12 jurors already got there once. 0:00 Lindsay Clancy loses again 1:01 Vinnie After Dark 1:14 Reddington is losing everything 2:38 He wanted the holdout juror on the stand 3:39 Why Alex Murdaugh was different 4:31 Even her supporters said hands off the jury 7:25 Jerry 8:40 What Judge Sullivan actually ruled 9:34 The questionnaire and the cell phone 11:31 Phone records and other jurors — denied 12:48 The double jeopardy motion 14:07 A mistrial is a tie game 16:19 Clancy hires Karen Read's appellate lawyer 17:52 Massachusetts protects jurors more than anywhere 21:10 Manifest necessity 21:36 United States v. Perez (1824) 22:49 Richardson v. United States (1984) 24:18 Renico v. Lett (2010) 26:47 Discovering misconduct after the fact 28:53 Oregon v. Kennedy — the only exception 30:31 What happens November 2nd 31:23 The Karen Read connection 33:56 The polls track the jury 37:22 Advantage: Lindsay Clancy 37:51 Will Reddington change his defense? 40:19 Hug the kids