If a juror successfully gets onto a jury by misleading the parties and the court, whether by an affirmative lie or an omission, it constitutes a failure of the lawyers involved.

“I feel like if a juror gets onto a jury after having misled either by an affirmative lie or an omission, if they misled the parties in the court, I think that's something that the court definitely has some interest in exploring further. But that ultimately in my view is a failure of the lawyers”

The defense counsel, Kevin Reddington, was correct to move for a mistrial when the prosecution repeatedly introduced improper testimony regarding religion.

“I would have granted the mistrial motion the second time that Redington made it and I would have I would have blown my top.”

The state improperly presented false evidence regarding the eyewitness testimony during the oral arguments.

“the state got away in this argument with the most repeated lie uh of this case, and that is the girls saw him. Rick saw the girls.”

The dismissal of the juror may result in a valid appellate issue for the defense.

“that opens it up to me to a ripe appellet issue. If I'm Diddy's appellet staff, I'm writing that brief as we speak.”

She believes it is inappropriate and potentially prejudicial for the prosecution to introduce the concept of mortal sin in the trial.

“Not only that, to bring up, did you know that murder is a moral sin is is actually it's crossing the boundaries between church and state, right?”

He advocates for the normalization of televising trials to foster public trust in the judicial system.

“I think it should be the rule rather than the exception to have cameras inside the courtroom. The exception should be protecting the privacy of victims. Protecting the the incredibly sensitive nature of some crimes. Sexual assault type crimes. You can understand in those cases why you might not broa”

He advocates for the appointment of a court monitor to oversee the Kennedy Center and ensure transparency regarding its finances, given the board's recent actions under Donald Trump.

“The court should appoint a monitor using its equitable authority, you know, like put it in receiverhip, but have a court-appointed monitor, former federal judge that reports only to Judge Cooper about the financial condition, about programming, about physical plant, about fundraising”

The legal system often struggles to handle complex cases when it forces them to fit into rigid, inefficient processes.

“And you know, I mean, the legal system we're going to talk I mean, I think you're going to ask me about Alex's appeal, and um so many times the legal system, it's a square hole, and we have a round peg, and it won't fit.”

Mental health issues should only be considered for the purpose of mitigating sentencing rather than as a complete legal defense against criminal responsibility.

“So, no, I do not want it to be used except for in mitigation on sentencing.”

The racketeering charges against Sean Combs are easier for the prosecution to prove than the sex trafficking charges.

“I think it's easier to prove Rico than sex trafficking in this case.”

She contends that the effort to impose new rules on mail-in ballots so close to the election is a deliberate attempt to disenfranchise voters.

“But because this is just a bald-faced way to try to disenfranchise millions of people at the 11th hour.”

He feels he was pressured and coerced by prosecutors to testify against Donald Trump.

“I would never have testified. I didn't want to. And you've been cancelled now by both sides.”

He argues that the indictment and removal of Maduro were purely pretextual moves for geopolitical power rather than genuine law enforcement actions.

“And you could make a compelling argument that the indictment and the removal of Maduro was purely pretextual for geopolitical uh power play and a an entirely defensible one at that.”

She argues that it benefits Google to keep the details and proceedings of their antitrust trial secret.

“I think that it benefits Google to not have to deal with a lot of the arguments being made here as it does it would for really most plaintiffs like as it would for Apple in Epic versus apple”

State criminal prosecutions of Donald Trump in New York were examples of lawfare and would not have been brought against other individuals.

“I think those cases were flatout lawfair. Those are cases that wouldn't have been brought against anyone else.”