Here's a crash course on doxastic wronging. The central question is: can merely believing something about others wrong them? Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josephcschmid OUTLINE 0:00 Intro 0:30 Cases 3:18 Definitions 7:40 Significance 9:47 Master Argument for Doxastic Wronging 16:00 Outward actions argument 20:11 The problem of control 25:05 The coordination problem 30:12 Going further & resources 31:16 Conclusion LINKS (1) Basu and Schroeder, "Doxastic Wronging": https://philarchive.org/archive/BASDW (2) Schroeder, "Sins of Thought": https://philpapers.org/archive/SCHSOT-39.pdf (3) Enoch and Spectre, "There is no such thing as doxastic wronging": https://philpapers.org/archive/ENOTIN.pdf (4) My Epistemology playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLxRhaLyXxXkZhajIOE7Q2FkwuuAS-8Z3C (5) How to Analyze Arguments Like a Philosopher: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD5_2p-vUjs THE USUAL... Follow the Majesty of Reason podcast! https://open.spotify.com/show/4Nda5uNcGselvKphtKSKvH Join the Discord and chat all things philosophy! https://dsc.gg/majestyofreason My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/joseph-schmid