The Lindsay Clancy trial has somehow become a trial of almost everybody except the twelve people officially deciding it. Kevin Reddington says one juror is refusing to apply the judge’s reasonable-doubt instructions. Patrick Clancy has faced unsupported online theories and criticism for rebuilding his life. Reddington also says prosecutors never offered Lindsay a plea deal before pursuing first-degree murder. Tony Brueski connects all three. Can twelve ordinary people realistically resolve psychiatric questions experts themselves cannot settle? Why do strangers believe Patrick owes them a lifetime performance of grief? And if Lindsay’s future could involve either life in prison or psychiatric confinement depending on criminal responsibility, what outcome is the justice system actually trying to produce? This case is about accountability. The uncomfortable question is whose. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Check out Robin Dreeke's MasterClass: http://masterclass.com/robindreeke Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PatrickClancy #JuryDeadlock #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalResponsibility #HiddenKillers #JusticeSystem #TrueCrimeYouTube #TonyBrueski