In The Well host Mark Geragos is joined by former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney Jacob Kaplan to discuss the Cornell 7 case, why the DA’s office felt pressure to respond, the differences in Jane Doe’s statements, the media’s rush to convict the seven men accused in the court of public opinion, why the snapchat could be used as evidence if criminal charges are pursued, how these allegations are already affecting the seven men accused, the parallels to the Harvey Weinstein retrial, why it’s important to take a step back and not rush to judgement, LA Magazine contributor Lauren Conlin joins Mark to discuss Judge Sullivan denying defense attorney Kevin Reddington’s Rule 25 motion to find Lindsay Clancy not guilty, why Reddington did not say Clancy did not commit murder at the status hearing on Tuesday, the legal reason Lindsay Clancy did not ask her husband for forgiveness, what will happen at the upcoming Lindsay Clancy hearing on November 2nd, why Reddington’s double jeopardy argument for dismissal could survive, the holdout juror’s latest statements, and more. Mark Geragos: https://geragos.com Jacob Kaplan: https://agilawgroup.com Lauren Conlin: https://x.com/conlin_lauren Follow MK True Crime on all social platforms: YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@MKTrueCrime X - https://x.com/mktruecrime Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/mktruecrime TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@mktruecrime