Matt Walsh argues that the American legal system inappropriately protects young offenders who commit heinous violent crimes.

“Someone who kills an unarmed teenager at a track meet over a light shove should not have the possibility of being a free man in 20 years, much less 2 years. That's where we are.”

Violent crime, particularly by repeat offenders, is being exacerbated by soft-on-crime policies and the release of dangerous individuals.

“Her horrific murder is a direct result of failed soft on crime policies that put criminals before innocent people.”

Universities should implement enhanced security measures, such as armed guards at building entrances, to mitigate the danger of active shooters.

“Is it so hard to for them to have at Brown University, which actually isn't even that huge? I mean, it's very exclusive, so it's it's not that huge. Um, to have a guard at every door, an armed guard at every building, an armed guard at every building.”

Placing armed guards in schools is a necessary measure to protect students from copycat shooting events, regardless of gun control laws.

“so long as there are these uh mimetic copycat type events that have been happening for what 20 years now, uh deal with it and put armed guards in schools. Absolutely.”

Many hate crime reports are hoaxes characterized by absurdly cartoonish narratives.

“what you discover with a lot of hate hoaxes is this kind of crude almost reverse menstrual show presentation where you've got the swasti is written on the wall but it's written backwards the arms they're going the wrong way and I think that that's a pretty good sign that you're encountering a hoax”

The label of hate speech is propaganda used by the government to justify spying and pre-crime measures.

“Does that make it more egregious? Do we need more government funds to to spy on people so that we can test them with pre-crime if they said the word hate yesterday? Like, it I don't know, man. It feels like propaganda.”