AIPAC's involvement in the New Jersey primary was a failure that failed to discipline the Democratic caucus as intended.

“So the fact that they failed on what they wanted to be a demonstration of their strength and a you know a grab to discipline the Democratic caucus and get them back completely in line is also really noteworthy and and you know quite extraordinary and significant.”

AIPAC's financial influence is a major issue that threatens the integrity of Democratic primaries.

“We at Leaders We Deserve, our friends over at Justice Democrats, the Sunrise Movement, and other groups, and obviously you all too, are working to make the biggest asset these groups have, which is their money, their biggest liability.”

AIPAC actively masks its involvement in elections by funneling money through obscure, unbranded super PACs and convoluted financial pathways.

“It's just completely hiding it, which it's, you know, it's totally legal to participate in the political process. All we're asking is just, you know, do it with your chest out, like stand behind what you believe in.”

Blakeley considers the defeat of candidates who received financial backing from AIPAC to be a positive outcome.

“Apac and its allied super PACs funneled nearly 3 million through Shell Packacbold America to defend Espot. Voters in East Harlem said the Apac money was their breaking point. One voter told reporters it was the last straw.”

Russell Dobular describes the recent primary losses for AIPAC-supported candidates as a major political failure.

“last night was a catastrophic night for Apac. Let's count the bodies.”