Share of analysed episodes per month, Oct 2025 to Sep 2026: 1 of 3,272, 4 of 3,169, 0 of 3,426, 0 of 3,657, 0 of 3,818, 1 of 4,243, 1 of 3,937, 1 of 3,763, 4 of 3,778, 0 of 3,967, 0 of 3,936, 0 of 4,081.
The Supreme Court currently functions as a partisan, corrupt, or politically aligned institution that undermines democratic principles.
5 people · 4 episodes
The current US Supreme Court operates as an extension of the Republican Party.
“No, I think that the Supreme Court has proven itself to be an arm of the Republican Party, if nothing else.”
Brian Tyler Cohen · May 2026 · 2 episodes · 609K views on this topicThe Supreme Court has become a partisan, corrupt institution that needs to be reined in through radical reforms like packing the court and impeaching justices.
“This court needs to be dealt with, okay? It needs to be dealt with. We need to come up with a code of ethics and impeach the justices who violate it, which is like quite literally all of the conservative ones. We need to pack the [ __ ] court.”
Secular Talk · Jun 2026 · 1 episode · 325K views on this topicThe Supreme Court is functioning as a political enforcement arm rather than a neutral judiciary.
“I really do believe that they're acting more like a political enforcement arm than a judiciary.”
MeidasTouch · Nov 2025 · 1 episode · 172K views on this topicThe Supreme Court lacks moral integrity and failed to uphold the Constitution by refusing to hear challenges to its own overreach.
“I don't believe that they have the guts. I don't believe that they have any morals. I think it's sad that this is our Supreme Court. But there has to be a change.”
MeidasTouch · Nov 2025 · 1 episode · 172K views on this topicThe Supreme Court currently exhibits a strong pro-Republican bias and tends to align with the administration's policy goals where legally permissible.
“It says that the court is in the pocket of the Republicans and that the court is basically going to more or less do what the administration wants to the extent that it can.”
The Rest Is Politics US · Jun 2026 · 1 episode · 145K views on this topicThe Supreme Court should overturn specific precedents that conflict with natural law or sound constitutional interpretation.
3 people · 2 episodes
The Supreme Court should be willing to overturn long-standing precedents like Obergefell v. Hodges if they are not based on the Constitution.
“The Supreme Court changes its views on long-standing precedent all the time based on our current interpretations of the Constitution. I actually think there's a very very strong probability gay marriage is overturned, but what say you guys?”
Timcast IRL · Nov 2025 · 3 episodes · 852K views on this topicThe Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade was a bad decision based on seeking a specific outcome rather than sound legal reasoning.
“even Ruth Bader Ginsburg was clear about the fact that the Roe decision was a bad decision. Like they were looking for a result with Roe. They weren't actually deciding based on any kind of legal precedent or any kind of legal reasoning beyond we are looking for this result”
Timcast IRL · Nov 2025 · 3 episodes · 852K views on this topicThe Supreme Court should overturn the Obergefell decision because same-sex marriage is contrary to natural law.
“I hope the court overrules Obergefell now. It's a ridiculous decision on like every front. On textualist grounds, it's ridiculous. On originalist grounds, it's ridiculous. On substantive grounds, it's ridiculous. On natural law grounds, it's just crazy. It doesn't make any sense.”
Michael Knowles · Nov 2025 · 2 episodes · 98K views on this topicExtracted by a model; may misattribute who said what.
Showing 10 of 30
Complete months · first on record Jun 2023